Quantcast
top of page

What is the Impoundment Control Act & How It Protects the Constitutional Balance of Powers

Writer's picture: January 6th NewsJanuary 6th News

Key Takeaways

  • The Impoundment Control Act (ICA) maintains the constitutional balance of powers between the legislative and executive branches by protecting Congress’ role as the sole authority over federal expenditures. 

  • Without ICA, presidents could commit executive overreach and control federal spending via executive orders, effectively empowering the president to cancel any programs he or she opposes. 


The Constitution gives Congress the authority to decide how federal funds will be spent. The President has the authority to implement those funding laws. The Impoundment Control Act (ICA) was enacted to reinforce this distinction of roles and ensure that federal spending aligns with Congress' decisions, setting procedures for the President to follow when proposing to delay or cancel funding appropriated by Congress and safeguarding the constitutional balance of powers. 


What is the Impoundment Control Act?

The Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 reasserts Congress' "power of the purse," ensuring that federal funds are spent as Congress appropriated. Title X of the Act—commonly referred to as "Impoundment Control"—established guidelines to prevent executive overreach in spending decisions. It also created the House and Senate Budget Committees and the Congressional Budget Office to provide oversight.


The Constitution gives Congress the authority to decide how federal funds will be spent. The President has the authority to implement those funding laws. The Impoundment Control Act (ICA) was enacted to reinforce this distinction of roles and ensure that federal spending aligns with Congress' decisions, setting procedures for the President to follow when proposing to delay or cancel funding appropriated by Congress and safeguarding the constitutional balance of powers. 

Why was the ICA necessary?

The ICA was passed in response to President Nixon’s refusal to release Congressionally approved funds for programs his administration opposed. The U.S. Constitution grants Congress the authority to allocate federal funds, while the executive branch is responsible for disbursing those funds. The ICA created a process the President must follow if he or she seeks to delay or cancel funding that Congress has provided. For further details, the U.S GAO outlines the ICA’s implementation and congressional review process.



The Basics of Impoundments

  • What does it mean to "impound" funds?An "impoundment" occurs when federal funds are not spent or obligated as directed by Congress, whether temporarily or permanently.

  • What has the Supreme Court said about impoundments?In Train v. City of New York (1975), the Supreme Court ruled that even without the ICA, the President cannot unilaterally impound funds. Congress holds exclusive authority over federal spending.



How Does the ICA Work?

  • Rescissions
    • If the President seeks to cancel part of an appropriation, a rescission must be approved by Congress. The President submits a special message detailing the amount, rationale, and effects of the proposed rescission. Funds can be withheld for up to 45 legislative days, but if Congress does not approve the rescission, the funds must be made available for use.

  • Deferrals
    • A deferral delays the obligation or spending of funds. The ICA permits deferrals only for specific reasons: managing contingencies, improving operational efficiency, or as otherwise authorized by law. Deferrals must also be reported to Congress, and they cannot extend beyond the fiscal year in which they are proposed. Consult, 2 USC Ch. 17b: Impoundment Control.


Recent Context

In recent years, debates over the limits of executive authority under the ICA have resurfaced. For example, questions arose during President Trump’s first administration when security assistance funding for Ukraine was withheld. More recently, Trump ordered that all federal assistance be temporarily paused. These incidents highlight the potential for disputes over whether the executive branch can unilaterally delay or reduce funding for policy reasons.


Proposals to expand executive authority to impound funds have sparked concerns about the erosion of Congressional control over budgeting. Critics warn that unchecked impoundments could disrupt funding for essential services, such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure, bypassing democratic oversight.


The Constitution remains clear: Congress, as the representative of the people, has the sole authority to determine how taxpayer dollars are spent. The ICA ensures that these decisions are respected and prevents any branch of government from circumventing this foundational principle.

Latest Arrests & Convictions

Key Players

Election Fraud Claims

Fulton Grand Jury

Top Stories

bottom of page